A 30-second reel. Candid statements. Identifying details redacted.
Identified. Surveilled. Profiled in advance of trial, for the convenience of the Coalition.
On the condition of anonymity. Tape stopped, then restarted, then stopped again.
I had the guy. Plea offer on the table. Dead to rights. Then I saw the entry of appearance and I knew it was going to be a long morning. I packed a second coffee.
You write the affidavit. You think it's clean. You think no one is going to read it that closely. He reads it that closely. He found the one comma that was in the wrong place. The judge granted the motion.
Six-month investigation. Wires. Two CIs. Federal indictment. He took it apart in a single two-hour suppression hearing. He knew our informant's history better than we did.
Most defense attorneys take the L on a bad trial-court ruling and move on. They protect the record for appeal. He just files. Same week. Sometimes the same day. We are not built for the same-day filing.
He remembers every prior inconsistent statement my witness has ever made. Every one. I have started to wonder if he keeps a binder. I have started to wonder if I should start a binder.
Look. I have worked plenty of cases against plenty of defense lawyers. Most of them I respect. This one I respect and I resent. Those are not, in my experience, the same feeling.
Each count is independently sufficient. Pleaded in the alternative.
"We hold no personal animus toward Mr. Matthews. He is, by all accounts, polite in chambers. That is precisely the problem."
Most attorneys see a bad ruling and preserve the record for later appeal. He sees a bad ruling and sees a supervisory writ. To him, deadlines are not suggestions.
The whole discovery. Including the supplemental reports. Including the footnotes. He found the footnotes.
He refers to the Federal Rules of Evidence by number. Not just 403 and 404(b). All of them. We have caught him citing 902(11) without notes.
From 2001 to 2006. Combat deployment to Afghanistan. So the standard courtroom intimidation tactics, such as they are, have not produced the desired effect.
Not once. More than once. With, we are told, every intention of returning. When a case demands it, he takes the question all the way up. He just does not stop.
Patiently. Politely. With the air of a man who has all afternoon, several spare copies of your prior testimony, and no particular interest in helping you out.
The threshold for a Franks hearing is, by design, exceptionally high. He clears it. The threshold is, by design, exceptionally narrow. He keeps it.
He has been known to refuse a favorable plea offer in the morning and file a Motion to Suppress in the afternoon. The motion is granted. The favorable plea is no longer required.
A non-exhaustive log of recent infractions, taken from the public docket. Reader discretion advised.
Meetings held weekly. Tissues provided. Outside food permitted.
"I have started bringing three copies of everything. He will find the one I didn't bring."
"He once got a confession thrown out because the interview room was two degrees too cold. I am not joking."
"He remembers every prior inconsistent statement. I think he has a photographic memory just to inconvenience me."
"I have stopped getting personally invested in whether my warrants survive. I have, instead, started writing them better."
Questions, anticipated. Answers, certified. A transcript of the deposition nobody requested.
In which the Coalition concedes, with characteristic reluctance, the underlying point of the entire enterprise.
The Coalition of Frustrated Prosecutors, Peace Officers, and Federal Agents wishes to clarify, for the record, that we hold no personal animus toward Mr. Matthews.
He is, by all accounts, polite in chambers. He returns calls. His pleadings are formatted correctly. He has, on more than one occasion, brought us coffee.
That is precisely the problem.
If we are to be defeated on the merits, week after week, by a single attorney in a quiet, well-prepared, profoundly inconvenient fashion, the very least the public can do is be made aware of it.
Know a prosecutor who needs to see this?
A defendant who needs the man they're complaining about?
It begins with a phone call. Short. Direct. He asks what happened before he asks anything else.
Privileged and sealed. We have tried, repeatedly, to learn what gets said in that room. We cannot.
Every page of discovery gets read. Every deadline gets calendared. Somewhere on a legal pad, a writ is already taking shape.
Then comes the plan: motions, hearings, and if a trial court gets it wrong, the question goes up. You have read the preceding exhibits. You know the rest.
Serious state felony defense. Statewide writs and appeals. Federal criminal defense in the Eastern District of Louisiana and the Fifth Circuit.
Consult Jerome Matthews