In the Court of Public Opinion
Parish of Orleans · State of Louisiana
Plaintiff(s): The Coalition of Frustrated Prosecutors,
Peace Officers, and Federal Agents
v.
Defendant: Jerome Matthews, Esq.
La. Bar No. 33964
Re: Continuing Course of Inconvenient Conduct
Filed
REEL 1 OF 1 RUNTIME: ONGOING FILED IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST NEW ORLEANS, LA
Filed · This Day
A Coalition Production
I HATE JEROME MATTHEWS
 
NEW ORLEANS · LOUISIANA
★ Now Playing in Open Court ★

"They try to lock 'em up.
He sets 'em free."

A 30-second reel. Candid statements. Identifying details redacted.

ACT I

The Defendant

Identified. Surveilled. Profiled in advance of trial, for the convenience of the Coalition.

The SubjectA profile of the individual in question, prepared for internal reference.

Subject
Jerome Matthews, photographed in the French Quarter
LA · 33964
Jerome Matthews
a.k.a. "The One Who Files."
Bar No.
Louisiana 33964
Admitted
2011 · Active · Good Standing
Prior Service
U.S. Marine Corps, 2001 to 2006
Education
Tulane University · UC Berkeley School of Law
Practice
Serious state felonies · Statewide writs · Appeals · Federal criminal defense
Honors
La. Super Lawyer (14 consecutive years) · LACDL Blackstone Award
THREAT LEVEL: MAXIMUM · Subject continues to file supervisory writs, read entire discovery files, and cite Franks v. Delaware. Approach with prepared briefs.
Days Since Last Supervisory Writ
0
This counter has never required maintenance.
ACT II

The Witnesses

On the condition of anonymity. Tape stopped, then restarted, then stopped again.

ConfessionalsSworn statements. Identifying details redacted. Tap a redaction if you must.

██

██████████Denied

Asst. District Attorney · Orleans

I had the guy. Plea offer on the table. Dead to rights. Then I saw the entry of appearance and I knew it was going to be a long morning. I packed a second coffee.

██

██████████Denied

Veteran Detective · 17 yrs

You write the affidavit. You think it's clean. You think no one is going to read it that closely. He reads it that closely. He found the one comma that was in the wrong place. The judge granted the motion.

██

██████████Denied

Assistant U.S. Attorney · EDLA

Six-month investigation. Wires. Two CIs. Federal indictment. He took it apart in a single two-hour suppression hearing. He knew our informant's history better than we did.

██

██████████Denied

Federal Agent · DEA Task Force

Most defense attorneys take the L on a bad trial-court ruling and move on. They protect the record for appeal. He just files. Same week. Sometimes the same day. We are not built for the same-day filing.

██

██████████Denied

Asst. District Attorney · Jefferson

He remembers every prior inconsistent statement my witness has ever made. Every one. I have started to wonder if he keeps a binder. I have started to wonder if I should start a binder.

██

██████████Denied

Special Agent · FBI NOLA

Look. I have worked plenty of cases against plenty of defense lawyers. Most of them I respect. This one I respect and I resent. Those are not, in my experience, the same feeling.

ACT III

The Charges

Each count is independently sufficient. Pleaded in the alternative.

"We hold no personal animus toward Mr. Matthews. He is, by all accounts, polite in chambers. That is precisely the problem."

  1. Sustained
    1

    He files. Always.

    Most attorneys see a bad ruling and preserve the record for later appeal. He sees a bad ruling and sees a supervisory writ. To him, deadlines are not suggestions.

    See: URCA Rule 4-3 · La. Code Crim. P. art. 912.1
  2. Sustained
    2

    He reads the discovery.

    The whole discovery. Including the supplemental reports. Including the footnotes. He found the footnotes.

    See: Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)
  3. Sustained
    3

    He knows the rules.

    He refers to the Federal Rules of Evidence by number. Not just 403 and 404(b). All of them. We have caught him citing 902(11) without notes.

    See: Fed. R. Evid. 403, 404(b), 902(11)
  4. Sustained
    4

    He was a Marine.

    From 2001 to 2006. Combat deployment to Afghanistan. So the standard courtroom intimidation tactics, such as they are, have not produced the desired effect.

    See: DD Form 214 · United States Marine Corps
  5. Sustained
    5

    He argues at the Louisiana Supreme Court.

    Not once. More than once. With, we are told, every intention of returning. When a case demands it, he takes the question all the way up. He just does not stop.

    See: La. Sup. Ct. Oral Argument Calendar · Recurring
  6. Sustained
    6

    He cross-examines.

    Patiently. Politely. With the air of a man who has all afternoon, several spare copies of your prior testimony, and no particular interest in helping you out.

    See: Fed. R. Evid. 611 · La. Code Evid. art. 611
  7. Sustained
    7

    He cites Franks.

    The threshold for a Franks hearing is, by design, exceptionally high. He clears it. The threshold is, by design, exceptionally narrow. He keeps it.

    See: Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978)
  8. Sustained
    8

    He does not settle for less.

    He has been known to refuse a favorable plea offer in the morning and file a Motion to Suppress in the afternoon. The motion is granted. The favorable plea is no longer required.

    See: U.S. Const. amend. IV · Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
0
Years La. Super Lawyer
· Consecutive ·
0
La. Bar Number
· In Good Standing ·
0
Federal Circuit Practice
· EDLA · Fifth Cir. ·
Headaches Generated
· To Date ·
★★★★★
"Five writs. Out of a possible five."
The Coalition Quarterly
★★★★★
"Relentless. Unstoppable. Disturbingly polite."
A Detective, Probably
★★★★★
"I could not put the discovery down. Neither, unfortunately, could he."
Anonymous ADA
★★★★★
"The feel-bad hit of the judicial year."
Prosecutors' Digest
ACT IV

The Evidence

A non-exhaustive log of recent infractions, taken from the public docket. Reader discretion advised.

On the RecordSelected case entries. The State has, in each instance, been on notice.

ENTRY 01 · STATUS: RECURRING
The Supreme Court Arguments
Louisiana Supreme Court · New Orleans
Has presented oral argument before the Louisiana Supreme Court on more than one occasion, with every indication of returning. The Court listens. The Court takes notes. We take antacids.
Arguing on the Merits
ENTRY 02 · STATUS: GRANTED
The Emergency Writ
Filed in days · Decided in his client's favor
Obtained reversal of an en banc appellate court decision in an emergency matter on an expedited writ. The lower court produced multiple separate dissents. He produced one result.
Persuading the Court
ENTRY 03 · STATUS: PENDING REVIEW
The Federal Challenges
U.S. District Court · Eastern District of Louisiana
Prepares and files constitutional challenges to state legislation in federal court. We are reviewing the dockets. We are not enjoying them.
Filing in Federal Court
ENTRY 04 · STATUS: SUPPRESSED
The Suppression Memoranda
District Courts · Statewide
Files post-hearing suppression memoranda raising Franks v. Delaware and Miranda challenges. The memoranda have citations. The citations have pin cites.
Citing Franks v. Delaware
ENTRY 05 · STATUS: WITHDRAWN (BY THE STATE)
The 404(b) Oppositions
District Courts · Statewide
When the State proposes introducing prior bad-acts evidence, he files an opposition memorandum. The State has been known to withdraw the proposal.
Reading 404(b) Closely
ENTRY 06 · STATUS: SEVERED
The Motions to Sever
District Courts · Statewide
Drafts and files motions to sever. Co-defendants are now, regrettably from the State's perspective, severed.
Successful Severance
ACT V

The Support Group

Meetings held weekly. Tissues provided. Outside food permitted.

The HatersA brief, sympathetic survey of those most affected.

█████████Denied
ADA · Orleans Parish

"I have started bringing three copies of everything. He will find the one I didn't bring."

█████████Denied
Special Agent · FBI

"He once got a confession thrown out because the interview room was two degrees too cold. I am not joking."

█████████Denied
ADA · Jefferson Parish

"He remembers every prior inconsistent statement. I think he has a photographic memory just to inconvenience me."

█████████Denied
Federal Task Force · NOLA

"I have stopped getting personally invested in whether my warrants survive. I have, instead, started writing them better."

ACT VI

The Record

Questions, anticipated. Answers, certified. A transcript of the deposition nobody requested.

DEPOSITION OF THE WEBSITE ITSELF
Taken pursuant to notice · All objections reserved
Reported by: The Undersigned, CCR
Q. Is this a real organization?
A. No. It is satire. The Coalition does not exist,
although the frustration is widely reported.
.
Q. Is Jerome Matthews a real attorney?
A. Regrettably for the State, yes. Louisiana Bar
No. 33964, in good standing since 2011.
.
Q. Do prosecutors actually hate him?
A. "Hate" is a strong word. The record reflects a
sustained professional inconvenience.
.
Q. What does he actually practice?
A. Criminal defense. Supervisory writs. Appeals.
Federal court in the Eastern District of
Louisiana and the Fifth Circuit.
.
Q. How do I reach him?
MR. COALITION: Objection. Asked and answered.
A. jeromematthews.com. The witness is excused.
EPILOGUE

A Note from the Editors

In which the Coalition concedes, with characteristic reluctance, the underlying point of the entire enterprise.

The Coalition of Frustrated Prosecutors, Peace Officers, and Federal Agents wishes to clarify, for the record, that we hold no personal animus toward Mr. Matthews.

He is, by all accounts, polite in chambers. He returns calls. His pleadings are formatted correctly. He has, on more than one occasion, brought us coffee.

That is precisely the problem.

If we are to be defeated on the merits, week after week, by a single attorney in a quiet, well-prepared, profoundly inconvenient fashion, the very least the public can do is be made aware of it.

The Editors Coalition of Frustrated Prosecutors,
Peace Officers, and Federal Agents
New Orleans, Louisiana
★ Service of Process ★

Know a prosecutor who needs to see this?
A defendant who needs the man they're complaining about?

Link copied. Service is complete.

Procedural HistoryFor the record: what happens after someone calls him. We have watched it too many times.

01

The Call

It begins with a phone call. Short. Direct. He asks what happened before he asks anything else.

02

The Confidential Consultation

Privileged and sealed. We have tried, repeatedly, to learn what gets said in that room. We cannot.

03

The Case Review

Every page of discovery gets read. Every deadline gets calendared. Somewhere on a legal pad, a writ is already taking shape.

04

The Strategy

Then comes the plan: motions, hearings, and if a trial court gets it wrong, the question goes up. You have read the preceding exhibits. You know the rest.

So entered · Clerk, Court of Public Opinion
Jerome Matthews on the courthouse steps
Counsel of Record · La. Bar No. 33964
★ Wherefore, Premises Considered ★

If they are this annoyed,
imagine what he could do for you.

Serious state felony defense. Statewide writs and appeals. Federal criminal defense in the Eastern District of Louisiana and the Fifth Circuit.

Consult Jerome Matthews
Matthews Law Office, LLC · La. Bar No. 33964 · New Orleans, LA
This is satire. He is real. Attorney Advertising · Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.